tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5022598985746522423.post1307448622763176566..comments2009-07-27T08:43:58.472-04:00thornhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06716924997177391607noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5022598985746522423.post-42821919124805525152009-07-27T08:43:58.472-04:002009-07-27T08:43:58.472-04:00Anonymous,<br /> Discrimination is a good and necessary thing. You make it sound evil. You discriminate every time you make a decision(what&#39;s for lunch?). We must , as a society, discriminate about what is best for society - and every society that destroys &#39;traditional&#39; marriage or the family and promotes homosexuality descends into chaos. Those that take away arms end up in oppression and genocide.John Spinuzzihttp://www.remote-world.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5022598985746522423.post-11053916928473237882009-04-11T12:02:00.000-04:002009-04-11T12:02:00.000-04:00If gun ownership rights were taken away, they were taken away from <B>everyone</B>. The right to marry was <B>not</B> taken away from everyone; It was only taken away from gays, and that is discrimination.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5022598985746522423.post-47152757617948408102009-03-07T14:32:00.000-05:002009-03-07T14:32:00.000-05:00BZZZT, Wrong, BC. The right to firearms is protected constitutionally, the right to marry, though universally accepted, is not protected constitutionally. In fact the government has much LESS right to take away guns than they do either money, or marriage. Not that they should take any of them, but be aware of the facts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5022598985746522423.post-78540708588413535682009-02-16T20:52:00.000-05:002009-02-16T20:52:00.000-05:00Not accurate, taking a gun away is one thing, paying taxes (when the government takes your money and redistributes it) is another thing, yet to take away someone's right to marry is another - California might be regulated but just because San Francisco took away someone's guns and their money (which they have the right to do as the government) doesn't give the rest of the population the right to take away other people's rights to marry.BCnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5022598985746522423.post-36032221467656591122008-12-21T14:16:00.000-05:002008-12-21T14:16:00.000-05:00Deadly accurate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5022598985746522423.post-62096321527614384202008-11-16T22:32:00.000-05:002008-11-16T22:32:00.000-05:00Exactly.Eric Ogunbasehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11346914392080396160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5022598985746522423.post-44964084334994758992008-11-15T20:35:00.000-05:002008-11-15T20:35:00.000-05:00You hit the nail on the head!DJKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11077813900350300205noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5022598985746522423.post-15438640169985570102008-11-15T13:16:00.000-05:002008-11-15T13:16:00.000-05:00Bingo.<BR/>Perfect assessment.<BR/>You nailed it.Mark Millerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15155390616574310800noreply@blogger.com